requestId:68629a9ea390b0.07133463.
The american Supreme Court made its final ruling in the West Virginia case against the american Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) case: Restricting the power of the american Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to use the Clean Air Act to monitor gas emissions from electricity-emitting plants. This is a landmark case sanction made by the American Supreme Court, which severely limits the Federal authorities’ ability to face climate change. Climate change should be one of Biden’s election promises. This time, the key to controlling the emissions of temperature-domain gas should be damaged due to the Supreme Court’s ruling, which will double the “study” of Biden’s climate action and a bleak future.
(Source: Global Zero Carbon ID: carbon-done Author: Penn)
After overturning the precepts of fetal rights and greatly expanding the gun rights, the american Supreme Court made another big news before the recession. This time, the american Supreme Court turned its attention to the heat-room gas.
On June 30, local time, the American Supreme Court (hereinafter referred to as the “Supreme Court”) made a final severance against the American National Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on West Virginia (representing 19 important states and major coal companies led by the Republican Party): It is clear that the American National Environmental Protection Agency has no right to limit temperature-room gas emissions on the state level, nor can it ask power plants to abandon renewable power for fossil fuels to use.
reported that the Supreme Court, which was the majority in the old, ruled a 6-3 vote that the Clean Air Act did not grant the american Environmental Protection Agency’s extensive authorization to monitor the emissions of gas from power plants, which are considered to be one of the causes of global heat.
The Supreme Court believes that under the Clean Air Act, EPA can monitor the temperature gas emissions of fossil electric power plants, but the Clean Air Act does not grant EPA a broader power to regulate the temperature gas emissions of power plants, that is, it is unauthorized that EPA limits carbon emissions and forces power plants to move from fossil fuels to renewable forces.
This is a landmark case ruling made by the american Supreme Court, which severely restricted the Federal authorities’ ability to change climate. Some media even believed that the ruling was “the Supreme Court put all the hand on Biden’s climate.”
In this regard, Biden denounced the Supreme Court to make another “destructive decision to allow our country to develop” and stressed that although the ruling decision could harm the country’s ability to maintain air cleanliness and should face climate change, the agency “will not give up the legal right to protect public health and climate crisis.”
United Nations Secretary General spokesperson Stephen Dugaric also expressed regret that this decision made by american, an important economic and carbon-emission country in the world, will double the goal of the Paris Agreement.
01
Biden is another twist in the fight against climate change
In the eyes of many foreign media, for Biden, who has always tried to advance the “climate process”, the Supreme Court’s ruling is undoubtedly a severe blow to his “climate ambition”.
On the first day of entering Baidi, Biden announced his participation in the Paris Agreement from the beginning, highlighting his determination to work on global climate issues.
In the administrative order of “Estimately Against Climate Crisis at Home and Foreign Countries” passed on January 27, 2021, Biden proposed to regard climate crisis as the middle between american foreign policy and national security, and to adopt a full-time approach to address climate crisis. Biden also publicly promised that by 2030, american will reduce heat-room gas emissions by 50% to 52% based on the 2005 outlook.
In September 2021, at the United Nations Conference, american President Biden spoke out in a verbal manner about the urgency, disaster and the need for all countries to work hard. Biden announced at the meeting that the american bureau will work with the State to fight for the climate funding support provided by american to developing countries by 2024, including a significant increase in support for suitable measures.
In addition, Biden’s administration and the Billionaire tried to promote a $19,000 revenue plan “Rebuilding the Wonderful Act” to expand the social security system of the American, reduce child care and medical prices, and focus on climate changes. Biden declared that more than $555 billion would be spent on power and climate planning grants. If the bill is passed, this will become the hard core content of Biden’s climate policy and will effectively promote the implementation of policies that should be subject to climate crisis.
However, in front of the great ambitions, Biden and his authorities welcomed the ups and downs again and again.
In March 2021, american 12 Republican-led states sued Biden for the climate change executive order and accused him of the incident. She hopes that she can accompany her and take care of her family without implementing the rules of the room gas. However, Chen Jubai is still thereLegal power. They pointed out that climate change should be supervised by the State Council. The executive order signed by Biden after taking office on January 20, 2021 violated the terms of the law. The 12 states as defendants believed that Biden violated the law and owed the authority of the State Council to its own pocket, and believed that this was now 5:50, and there was still five minutes to get off work. The economic consequences of the administrative order will be disaster-prone.
The “Reconstruction Beautiful Act” that was highly regarded by all parties, was approved by the House of Commons and was held in a debate with the Republican Party to criticize the Party, West Virginia’s party member Mahjong suddenly publicly opposed the bill. His opposition vote brought a fatal blow to Biden’s plan, resulting in the debate being materially terminated and has not yet made any progress.
Image: american power-related carbon dioxide emissions
Source: ameEscort At the same time, the American Motor Information Agency (EIA) statistics show that compared with 2020, the American Motor Information Agency has increased by 6% in 2021, with the largest contribution to the increase in power-related carbon dioxide emissions. According to the report of the Reuters Group, the research and consultation agency of the rican research and consultation agency, in 2021, american’s coal-fired power generation increased by 17% compared with 2020. This is the amount of coal-fired power generation of american since 2014.>The first growth has also directly led to a significant increase in carbon dioxide emissions in the american dynamic production area. Although this is market dynamics, in essence, the american authorities have not formulated clear power monitoring regulations, and there is no restriction on the coal and electricity of high-purity Escort.
<img src="https://img01.mybjx.net/news/UploadFile/202207/6379269478294918423055647.png" title="3.png" alt="3.png"//
Image: american power consumption carbon dioxide emissions (by source and department)
Source: americanManila escortMotor Information Agency
The climate change is one of Biden’s election promises. This time, the key to controlling the emissions of temperature-room gases was defeated due to the Supreme Court’s ruling, which will double the “shock” of Biden’s climate action and a bleak future. The focus of the
02
The key to the ruling
Pinay escort The “West Virginia Environmental Protection Agency” case is whether the american Environmental Protection Agency has broad power to regulate the gas emissions of electricity plants. Specifically, under the aid clause of the Sugar daddy Act, can the State be authorized by the Environmental Protection Department to issue serious rules in accordance with the legally statutory authority, that is, the institution can formulate serious rules without restrictions, including those that can be reshaped if it considers capital, non-global influences and power needs.What are the regulations on carbon removal of almost Sugar baby any economic department?
In this Escort, the majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts cited the principle of “Major Questions Doctrine”, which claims that the Air Cleanup Act does not grant the Environmental Protection Agency specific power to monitor gas emissions in the room. He wrote, put carbon dioxide emission face eggs beautiful? Could it be…that person? The i TC: